Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 35-37 (April 2009)


View previous. 11 of 19 View next.

Medical treatment of insulinomas: The role of diphenylhydantoin

Lara Al-Khoury NabboutCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Ibrahim S. Salti, Marie T. Merheb

Abstract 

Surgical removal of the insulinoma continues to be the treatment of choice. Medical therapy should be considered in patients who cannot undergo surgery. We are reporting our experience with regard to the efficacy of Diphenylhydantoin (DPH) in controlling hypoglycemia and suppressing insulin release in patients with insulinomas. DPH was administered orally at a dose of 300–400mg/day to three patients with documented endogenous insulin excess. The first two patients received the drug temporarily during the preoperative period, with resolution of the hypoglycemic attacks, normalization of blood glucose, and reduction of insulin levels. Subsequent surgery confirmed the presence of insulin-secreting pancreatic tumor. Cure was achieved after excision of the tumor. The third patient represented a diagnostic and threrapeutic challenge. An insulin-secreting tumor located in the body of the pancreas was diagnosed in a patient with type 2 diabetes and end stage renal disease. The patient’s poor cardiac function contraindicated surgery. DPH resulted in an excellent sustained control of his blood sugar and a fall in insulin levels for several months. We believe that DPH is a potent inhibitor of insulin secretion and, thus, is suitable as a temporary therapeutic measure in the preoperative period of patients with insulinoma, as well as an alternative to surgery for those who are not surgical candidates.

Article Outline

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Patients and results

2.1. Patient 1

2.2. Patient 2

2.3. Patient 3

3. Discussion

4. Conclusion

References

Copyright

1. Introduction 

return to Article Outline

Since its first description in the early 1920s, surgical removal of insulinoma is the treatment of choice [1], [2], [3]. Medical therapy should be considered for patients with insulinomas missed during pancreatic exploration, and for patients who refuse surgery or have inoperable/metastatic disease. We are reporting here three patients with insulinoma in whom diphenylhydantoin (DPH) was effective in suppressing insulin release and preventing hypoglycemia. A brief review is made of the properties of DPH as an insulin-suppressing agent.

2. Patients and results 

return to Article Outline

2.1. Patient 1 

Patient 1 was a 31-year-old male who presented with recurrent nocturnal seizures. Among a variety of antiepileptic drugs, he responded best to DPH. Further investigations led to the final diagnosis of hypoglycemia-induced seizures and imaging revealed a tumor in the pancreatic body. Pre-operatively, treatment with DPH was able to correct the hypoglycemia and thus prevent the seizures. A benign insulinoma was successfully removed and the patient was cured and became free of hypoglycemia and of seizures.

2.2. Patient 2 

Patient 2 was a 26 year old female who had a one year history of fasting hypoglycemic episodes and weight gain. Laboratory evaluation showed a low fasting serum glucose level (2.72mmol/l) with simultaneously elevated serum insulin (30.6μU/ml) and C-peptide (2ng/ml) levels. Complete blood count, renal and liver function tests, serum TSH, cortisol and GH levels were all normal. Endoscopic Ultra Sound (EUS) showed a 2×2cm tumor in the tail of the pancreas. Before undergoing a distal pancreatectomy four days later, DPH (400mg/d) resulted in a fall in insulin levels and a rise in fasting glucose levels (Table 1) and allowed discontinuation of intravenous dextrose infusion. Pathology revealed a benign insulinoma and post-operatively, the patient became totally free of hypoglycemic episodes.

Table 1.

Effect of DPH on serum glucose and insulin levels in case 2.

Before DPH
After DPH
Fasting serum glucose mmol/l (reference range)2.72 (3.33–5.55)3.33 (3.33–5.55)
Fasting serum insulin μU/ml (reference range)30.6 (4.0–25.0)20.0 (4.0–25.0)

2.3. Patient 3 

Patient 3 was a 65-year-old male a known case of previously poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. After 15 years he had ended with end-stage renal disease, requiring chronic hemodialysis. In the preceding year while on hemodialysis, he became euglycemic, even without insulin treatment, and thereafter started having recurrent fasting hypoglycemia with documented endogenous insulin excess. EUS revealed a 2×2cm lesion in the body of the pancreas. As he was not a surgical candidate due to advanced coronary artery disease, medical treatment for insulinoma had to be a substitute for surgery. He was started on DPH, 300mg/d with an excellent sustained control of his serum glucose and a fall in insulin levels (Table 2). Since the past 20 months the patient is still maintained on DPH and no hypoglycemic episodes.

Table 2.

Effect of DPH on serum glucose and insulin levels in case 3.

Before DPH
After DPH
Fasting serum glucose mmol/l (reference range)2.71 (3.33–5.55)6.66 (3.33–5.55)
Fasting serum insulin μU/ml (reference range)82.0 (4.0–25.0)31.7 (4.0–25.0)

3. Discussion 

return to Article Outline

In the cases presented above, DPH was effective in controlling hypoglycemia in three patients with insulinoma, either temporarily in the preoperative period or as an alternative to surgery. In humans and in animals DPH has been shown to cause hyperglycemia. The intraperitoneal injection of DPH in rabbits [4] and the intravenous administration of DPH in dogs [5] produced a marked increase in blood glucose levels. These observations were soon followed by the clinical recognition of hyperglycemia and even hyperglycemic non-ketotic coma after administration of DPH in humans [6], [7], [8].

MORE ABOUT THIS STUDY

Due to the advances in localization techniques and the high surgical success rates, the medical treatment of insulinomas has been a neglected topic in the last three decades. However, the use of agents that suppress insulin release should not be considered only as an alternative to surgery, but also as a temporary measure in the preoperative period.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS TOPIC

When surgery fails or cannot be undertaken in a patient with documented endogenous insulin excess, medical measures to suppress insulin releases become a life-saving necessity. Among the agents used in the literature are Diazoxide, Somatostatin analogue (Octreotide), Diphenylhydantoin, Glucocorticoids, Glucagon, Calcium channel blockers, and Beta blockers.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

Although Diazoxide is the most widely used drug in the medical treatment of insulinoma, several lines of evidence suggest that, through its ability to affect both the provision and release of insulin, Diphenylhydantoin has a broader action than Diazoxide and, thus, offers a better control of hypoglycemia.

The mechanism by which DPH causes hyperglycemia is believed to be impaired insulin release. This hypothesis was first suggested by Peters and Samaan [9] who reported a delayed and subnormal insulin response to glucose administration when the serum concentration of DPH was at toxic levels. Later on, the inhibition of insulin released by DPH was confirmed using the isolated perfused rat pancreas [10]. In humans, several studies have shown that oral administration of DPH results in a higher blood glucose response and diminution of the early and late post-prandial insulin responses [11]. All the above observations, and others [12], [13], [14] lead to the conclusion that, at blood levels similar to those attained in the treatment of epilepsy, DPH is a potent inhibitor of insulin release.

The mechanism of the inhibitory effect of DPH on glucose-induced insulin release has also been studied, using isolated pancreatic islet cells. DPH causes hyper-polarization of the plasma membrane in islet cells; an effect that could be brought about by the stimulatory effect of DPH on the membrane sodium–potassium–magnesium ATPase-related pump [15], [16], [17], which reduces the uptake of sodium by the islets. Optimal sodium concentration is necessary for insulin secretion [18]. Thus, it seems possible that the effects on cellular sodium are, in part, involved in the inhibitory mechanism of DPH. This pump system, in turn, may influence calcium uptake, an initial requirement for insulin secretion [19]. Furthermore, DPH has also been shown to block calcium uptake via voltage dependent calcium channels [20]. In addition, it also decreases calcium efficacy in the exocytotic system [21]. Peripheral inhibition of the action of insulin by DPH is another possible, but less confirmed, explanation for the DPH-induced hyperglycemia in vivo.

Another well-known effect of DPH is the inhibition of glucagon secretion in vitro [22] and in humans [23]. Due to its inhibitory effect on insulin release, we and others have used DPH to temporarily control hyperglycemia during the preoperative period in patients with insulinoma [24], [25], [26]. It has also been used in the treatment of hypoglycemia induced by inoperable insulinomas [27]. The advantages of DPH over Diazoxide, the most widely used drug in the medical treatment of insulinoma, were studied [28]. From the experimental observations of the perfused rat pancreas, it is known that insulin is stored in a labile compartment that is concentration-related to a larger and more stable storage compartment containing 98% of total β cell insulin [29]. And it is currently accepted that pancreatic insulin secretion is biphasic and involves the immediate release from the small labile pool followed by the subsequent provision of insulin to this labile pool from the larger storage compartment [30]. When Levin et al. [28] compared DPH and Diazoxide with respect to their effects upon insulin secretion by the isolated perfused rat pancreas, it was found that DPH inhibits both secretion from the labile insulin compartment and provision of insulin and/or precursors to this compartment, whereas Diazoxide inhibits insulin release from the labile pool, but continues to allow insulin to be provided by the larger storage compartment. This was translated into constant levels of inhibition by DPH during infusion of the agent, without escape, and without post-inhibitory overshoot, whereas with Diazoxide, although there was an initial fall in secretion, this was followed by an escape towards a pre-inhibition level followed by a post-inhibitory overshoot. Furthermore, Kizer et al. [31] showed that inhibition of insulin secretion by DPH could not be overcome by Tolbutamide, whereas Diazoxide inhibition can be reversed by Tolbutamide [32]. Thus, it is justifiable to state that DPH is advantageous over Diazoxide to blockade insulin release. Fariss and Lutcher [33] defined the optimal dose of DPH required for insulin suppression when they found that in response to oral glucose, the blood glucose levels were within the limits of normal with doses of DPH of 100, 200, 300mg/d but not with 400mg/d. The insulin response was further delayed with each increase of DPH to the point where there was little or no further effect during the test period of 400mg dosage. Therefore, a 400mg/d of DPH is recommended for adequate suppression of insulin secretion. Finally, our third patient represented a very challenging case in which an insulinoma was diagnosed in a type 2 diabetic patient. Very few similar cases have previously been reported in both type 1 and type 2 diabetics [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40]. The clinical implication is that the presence of an insulin-secreting tumor should be considered in a diabetic patient who presents with an otherwise unexplained hypoglycemia.

4. Conclusion 

return to Article Outline

Based on the above facts, we suggest that DPH is suitable as a temporary therapeutic measure in the preoperative period of patients with insulinoma, as well as an alternative to surgery for those who are not surgical candidates.

References 

return to Article Outline

[1]. [1]Harris S. Hyperinsulinism and dysinsulinism. JAMA. 1924;83:729.

[2]. [2]Wider RM, Allan FN, Power MH. Carcinoma of the islands of the pancreas. JAMA. 1927;89:348.

[3]. [3]Howland G, Campbell WR, Malthby EJ. Dysinsulinism, convulsion and coma due to islet cell tumor of the pancreas, with operation and cure. JAMA. 1992;93:674–679.

[4]. [4]Sanbar SS, Conway FJ, Zweifler AJ, et al. Diabetogenic effect of dilantin (abs.). Diabetes. 1967;16:533.

[5]. [5]Klein JP. Diphenylhydantoin intoxication associated with hyperglycemia. J Pediat. 1966;69(3):463–465. Abstract | Full-Text PDF (186 KB) | CrossRef

[6]. [6]Dahl JR. Diphenylhydantoin toxic psychosis with associated hyperglycemia. Calif Med. 1967;107(4):345–347. MEDLINE

[7]. [7]Said DM, Fraga JR, Reichelderfer TE. Hyperglycemia associated with diphenylhydantoine (dilantin) intoxication. Med Ann Dist Columbia. 1968;37(3):170–172. MEDLINE

[8]. [8]Goldberg EM, Sanbar SS. Hyperglycemic, nonketotic coma following administration of dilantin (diphenylhydantoin). Diabetes. 1969;18(2):101–106. MEDLINE

[9]. [9]Peters BH, Samaan NA. Hyperglycemia with relative hypoinsulinemia in diphenylhydantoin toxicity. New Eng J Med. 1969;281(2):91–92. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[10]. [10]Levin SR, Booker J, Smith DF, et al. Inhibition of insulin secretion by diphenylhydantoin in the isolated perfused pancreas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1970;30(3):400–401. CrossRef

[11]. [11]Malherbe C, Burrill KC, Levin SR, et al. Effect of diphenylhydantoin on insulin secretion in man. N Engl J Med. 1972;286:339–341. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[12]. [12]Draznin B, Ayalon D, Hoerer E, et al. Effect of diphenylhydantoin on patterns of insulin secretion in obese subjects. Acta Diabetol Lat. 1977;14:51–61. MEDLINE

[13]. [13]Hofeldt FD, Dippe SE, Levin SR, et al. Effects of diphenylhydantoin upon glucose-induced insulin secretion in three patients with insulinoma. Diabetes. 1974;23:192–198. MEDLINE

[14]. [14]Perry-Keene DA, Larkins RG, Heyma P, et al. The effect of long-term diphenylhydantoin therapy on glucose tolerance and insulin secretion: a randomized trial. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1980;12:575–580. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[15]. [15]Festoff BW, Appel SH. Effect of diphenylhydantoin on synaptosome sodium–potassium-ATPase. J Clin Invest. 1968;47(12):2752–2758. MEDLINE

[16]. [16]Kizer JS, Vargas-Cordon M, Brendel K, et al. The in vitro inhibition of insulin secretion by diphenylhydantoin. J Clin Invest. 1970;49:1942–1948. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[17]. [17]Levin SR, Kasson BG, Driessen JF. Adenosin triphosphateses of rat pancreatic islets: comparison of those with rat kidney. J Clin Invest. 1978;62:692–701. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[18]. [18]Hales CN, Milner RDG. The role of sodium and potassium in insulin secretion from rabbit pancreas. J Physiol (Lond). 1968;194:725–743. MEDLINE

[19]. [19]Grodsky GM, Bennett LL. Cation requirements for insulin secretion in the isolated perfused pancreas. Diabetes. 1966;15:910–913. MEDLINE

[20]. [20]Lebrun P, Sener A, Malaisse WJ, et al. Diphenylhydantoin inhibits calcium fluxes and insulin release in pancreatic islets. Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 1981;42(3):291–292. MEDLINE

[21]. [21]Nabe K, Fujimoto S, Shimodahira M, et al. Diphenylhydantoin supresses glucose-induced insulin release by decreasing cytoplasmic H+ concentration in pancreatic islets. Endocrinology. 2006;147:2717–2727. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[22]. [22]Gerich J, Charles MA, Levin SR, et al. In vitro inhibition of pancreatic glucagon secretion by diphenylhydantoin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1972;35:823. CrossRef

[23]. [23]Machina T, Marcus R, Levin SR. Inhibition of glucagon secretion by diphenylhydantoin in a patient with glucagonoma. West J Med. 1980;132:357. MEDLINE

[24]. [24]Cohen MS, Bower RH, Fidler SM, et al. Inhibition of insulin release by diphenylhydantoin and diazoxide in a patient with benign insulinoma. Lancet. 1973;301(7793):40–41. CrossRef

[25]. [25]Pelkonen R, Taskinen MR. Effect of diphenylhydantoin on plasma insulin in insulinoma. Lancet. 1973;1:604–605. MEDLINE

[26]. [26]Arnaout MA, Salti I. Phenytoin in benign insulinoma. Lancet. 1976;1:861. MEDLINE

[27]. [27]Imanaka S, Matsuda S, Ito K, et al. Medical treatment for inoperable insulinoma: clinical usefulness of diphenylhydantoin and diltiazem. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1986;16:65–71. MEDLINE

[28]. [28]Levin SR, Grodsky GM, Hagura R, et al. Comparison of the inhibitory effects of diphenylhydantoin and diazoxide upon insulin secretion from the isolated perfused pancreas. Diabetes. 1972;21:856–862. MEDLINE

[29]. [29]Curry DL, Bennett LL, Grodsky GM. Dynamics of insulin secretion by the perfused rat pancreas. Endocrinology. 1968;83:572–584. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[30]. [30]Grodsky GM, Curry D, Landahl H, et al. Further studies on the dynamic aspects of insulin release in vitro with evidence for a two-compartmental storage system. Acta Diabetol Lat. 1969;6(Suppl. 1):554–578.

[31]. [31]Kizer JS, Vargas-Cordon M, Brendel K, et al. The in vitro inhibition of insulin secretion by diphenylhydantoin. J Clin Invest. 1970;49(10):1942–1948. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[32]. [32]Basabe JC, Lopez NL, Viktora JK, et al. Insulin secretion studies in the perfused rat pancreas, I, Effect of tolbutamide, leucine and arginine; their interaction with diazoxide, and relation to glucose. Diabetes. 1971;20:449–456. MEDLINE

[33]. [33]Fariss BL, Lutcher CL. Diphenylhydantoin-induced hyperglycemia and impaired insulin release. Eff Dosage Diabetes. 1971;20:177–181.

[34]. [34]Svartberg J, Stridsberg M, Wilander E, et al. Tumor-induced hypoglycemia in a patient with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Int Med. 1996;239:181–185.

[35]. [35]Sakurai A, Aizawa T, Katakura M, et al. Insulinoma in a patient with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Endocr J. 1997;44(4):473–477. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[36]. [36]Wildbrett J, Nagel M, Theissig F, et al. An unusual picture of insulinoma in type-2 diabetes mellitus and morbid obesity. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1999;124:248–252. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[37]. [37]Eriguchi E, Aoyagi S, Hara M, et al. Insulinoma occurring in association with fatty replacement of unknown etiology in the pancreas: report of a case. Surg Today. 2000;30(10):937–941. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[38]. [38]Ravnik-Oblak M, Janez A, Kocijanicic A. Insulinoma induced hypoglycemia in a type 2 diabetic patient. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2001;113(9):339–341. MEDLINE

[39]. [39]Sapountzi P, Charnogursky G, Emanuele MA, et al. Diagnosis of insulinoma using continuous glucose monitoring system in a patient with diabetes. Clin Diabetes. 2005;23(3):140–143.

[40]. [40]Hameed MF, Hoyle GE, Muir Z. A mysterious case of normalizing blood sugar: insulinoma in a long-standing diabetic patient. Age Aging. 2006;35(3):317–318.

American University of Beirut Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology & Metabolism, P.O. Box 11-0236, Riad El-Solh, 1107 2020 Beirut, Lebanon

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +961 1 374374x8989; fax: +961 1 370814.

PII: S1877-5934(09)00009-5

doi:10.1016/j.ijdm.2009.03.005


View previous. 11 of 19 View next.