Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 26-31 (April 2009)


View previous. 9 of 19 View next.

Nutritional challenges in the elderly with diabetes

Ali A. RizviCorresponding Author Informationemail address

Received 13 March 2009; accepted 30 March 2009.

Abstract 

Adults age 60 and older will comprise two-thirds of the diabetic population by the year 2025. Older patients with diabetes are more likely to have coexistent chronic conditions like hypertension, dyslipidemia, and cardiovascular disease that may impact their nutritional requirements. The issue of attainment and maintenance of an optimal body weight in elderly diabetic persons may not be as straightforward as in other age groups, and the risk-benefit ratio may be different as well. Although increased prevalence of overweight and obesity in the elderly contributes to insulin resistance and hyperglycemia, older inhabitants of long-term care facilities who suffer from diabetes tend to be underweight. Both may signify inadequate nutritional status and lead to increased morbidity and mortality. The attendant problems of appetite changes, palatability of food, dietary restrictions, loneliness, and depression may affect the type and quantity of food consumed by elderly persons. Structured screening tools may identify nutrition-related issues that warrant evidence-based interventions. Although glucose control and health concerns are important factors in diet modification in the older population, other considerations include quality of life and individual preferences. Customizing of nutritional guidelines to the needs of the older diabetic patient makes sense.

Article Outline

Abstract

1. Nutritional status and diabetes in the elderly

2. The connection between diet, aging, and glucose metabolism

3. Diet and lifestyle interventions in older diabetic persons

4. Economic factors and psychosocial support

5. Diabetes medications, meals, and food-related glycemic excursions

6. Nutrition in the management of complications and co-morbidities

7. Nutritional aspects in the community-dwelling elderly with diabetes

8. Conclusion

References

Copyright

1. Nutritional status and diabetes in the elderly 

return to Article Outline

According to the Framingham Heart Study data, men and women with diabetes who are 50 years and older live an average 7.5 and 8.2 years less than individuals without diabetes [1]. Nutritional factors play a significant role in modulating all the traditional risk factors for atherosclerotic disease. Appropriate dietary changes in the setting of diabetes are a critical task in the pursuit of healthy aging in this subgroup. Diabetes in the elderly increases the risk of suboptimal nutrition, hospitalizations, nursing home admissions, and physical disability that substantially impairs quality of life [2], [3]. Minorities living in urban areas of the US are prone to poor nutrition and have increased rates of obesity, glucose intolerance and diabetes [4]. Community-dwelling older adults with diabetes are treated less vigorously than younger persons with diabetes, and many of them do not achieve targets for glucose control that are generally advocated by professional organizations [5].

The overlap of malnutrition and glucose intolerance in older people is common but frequently overlooked. The prevalence increases with frailty, physical infirmity, and institutionalization. In the US, about 16% of elderly persons living in the community are undernourished. These figures rise to 59% in long-term care institutions and 65% in acute care hospitals [6]. Malnutrition encompasses both under-nutrition, due to a deficiency of nutrients, and over-nutrition, resulting from overeating and lack of physical activity. Protein-energy malnutrition is a significant cause of weight loss among older people. “Failure to thrive” refers to a decline in functional status disproportional to disease burden, manifested by a weight loss greater than 5% from baseline. It may result from a variety of causes including protein–energy deficiency, loss of muscle mass and endurance, cognitive impairment, and depression. The latter is a particularly prevalent cause in the elderly with diabetes [7]. Age-related complications like digestive, oral, and dental problems, altered absorption of nutrients, declining renal function, functional disability, dementia, acute or chronic diseases and medication-related issues compound the scenario. Many elderly experience social, domestic, and economic changes. The presence of diabetes adds to the severity of these problems and increases the burden of daily self-care activities. To accurately recognize and treat nutrition-related issues among older adults, comprehensive assessment and screening tools, as well as interventions manuals that identify those who are at risk of malnutrition, are available [8], [9].

2. The connection between diet, aging, and glucose metabolism 

return to Article Outline

The prevalence of diabetes increases with age, and is highest in those older than 60 years. The rate of metabolism slows down with advancing age due to a decrease in lean body mass and increasingly sedentary lifestyle, resulting in a reduced daily energy requirement (Table 1). Underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms include an increase in insulin resistance related to weight gain and physical inactivity that is central to the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes and the metabolic syndrome [10]. A progressive failure of insulin production from the pancreatic beta cells may be a pre-programmed genetic defect or a natural concomitant of the aging process [11]. The emergence of postprandial hyperglycemia is followed by fasting hyperglycemia. Lifestyle modifications that include efforts at weight loss and physical activity lead to improved insulin sensitivity and can prevent glucose intolerance and type 2 diabetes mellitus in older adults. Interestingly, recent evidence suggests that the rate of carbohydrate digestion and absorption may influence the development of type 2 diabetes in the older individual. The health, aging and body composition study [12] prospectively cross-sectionally analysed dietary glycemic index and glycemic load of 2248 adults aged 70–80 years with measures of glucose metabolism and body fat distribution. An association between dietary glycemic index and selected predictors of type 2 diabetes such as hyperinsulinemia and centripetal obesity was seen.

Table 1.

Factors affecting glucose metabolism with age.

Resistance to insulin-mediated glucose uptake
Progressive reduction of insulin secretion form the pancreas
Changes in body composition: relative increase adipose tissue
In relation to muscle mass
Changes in food intake, timing, and composition
Impaired mobility and physical activity
Psychological factors, stress, and isolation
Use of medications that impair insulin sensitivity, release, or action
Genetic and ethnic influences

3. Diet and lifestyle interventions in older diabetic persons 

return to Article Outline

Studies have investigated the impact of nutritional and lifestyle changes in the elderly with diabetes. Dye et al. [13] identified factors that affect the nutrition and exercise behaviors of persons over the age of 55 with type 2 diabetes by conducting focus groups interviews to determine primary health concerns and health behaviors, favored learning modalities, barriers to learning, food preferences, and exercise preferences. The following major themes were identified: some risk factors for diabetes and heart disease seemed more pertinent to the subjects than others; perceived susceptibility for serious outcomes of diabetes could occur through vicarious learning; willpower, often obtained through faith, was necessary for successful behavior change; effective modification of behavior and building self-efficacy started with small steps; and intrinsic reinforcement was necessary for behavior change. A nutrition education intervention on improving the intake and behaviors related to whole grain foods in meal recipients in senior centers [14] involved a sample of 84 participants with a mean age of 77 years who completed a pretest, an educational intervention, and a post-test. Following the intervention, participants were more likely to be knowledgeable about one or more correct ways to identify whole grain foods and reported an increased intake of whole grain bread, cereal, and crackers. Older adults with diabetes can thus benefit from nutrition education designed to improve knowledge and skills necessary.

In spite of the plethora of advice available, very few diabetes education programs have been designed specifically for older adults. Miller and others [15] evaluated a randomized intervention to improve food label knowledge and skills in diabetes management among adults aged 65 years and older that included 10 weekly group sessions led by a dietitian incorporating information processing, learning theory, and social cognitive theory principles. The experimental group had greater improvement in total knowledge scores, positive outcome expectations, promoters of diabetes management, decision-making skills, fasting plasma glucose, glycated hemoglobin, and total cholesterol than the control group. Thus, correctable health deficits in the elderly can be assessed through screening protocols [16].

The American Dietetic Association advocates that the public should consume adequate amounts of dietary fiber from a variety of plant foods [17]. The recommended intake of 20–35g/day for healthy adults is not usually met because of low intake of fruits, vegetables, whole and high-fiber grain products, and legumes. Consumption of insoluble dietary fiber lowers blood cholesterol levels and reduces blood glucose and insulin levels. A diet adequate in fiber-containing foods usually has fewer calories, fat, and refined sugar, and is also usually rich in micronutrients and nonnutritive ingredients that have additional health benefits. A fiber-rich meal is processed more slowly in the gastrointestinal tract, thus promoting satiety. These salubrious features of a high-fiber diet promote the treatment and prevention of overweight, obesity, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes. Even with a fiber-rich diet, however, a supplement may be needed to bring fiber intakes into a range adequate to prevent constipation.

The dietitian, working with other members of the health care team, plays a very important role in developing a care plan for the older person with diabetes [18]. Nutrition education should be individually tailored and should incorporate patience, kindness, humor, understanding, and above all a respect for the differences that make each older person an individual. Skills at multifaceted assessment are necessary to pinpoint challenges in nutritional care, be able to synthesize all the information obtained in order to creatively design a workable dietary intervention, and adapt instruction techniques and tools for a wide variety of educational needs and abilities. Attributes to possess for successful outcomes are knowledge, skill, experience, astute judgment, and sincere caring. The experience and qualifications of the educator delivering the educational components would intuitively seem important. In one study, the knowledge, design and content scores of education were significantly higher in the certified diabetes educator registered dietitians (CDE-RDs) compared to those of the non-certified diabetes educator registered dietitians (non-CDE-RDs) [19]. A “Food Guide Pyramid for Older Adults” is available for use in the elderly population (Fig. 1). The American Diabetes Association (ADA) Diabetes Food Pyramid (available at http://www.diabetes.org/nutrition-and-recipes/nutrition/foodpyramid.jsp) divides food into six groups. The largest group consisting of servings of grains, beans, and starchy vegetables forms the base. The smallest group comprising of fats, sweets, and alcohol is at the top of the pyramid; patients with diabetes are advised to consume sparingly from this food group. In order to formulate a meal plan tailored to the individual goals, the ADA recommends that individuals with diabetes consult a registered dietitian (RD) or certified diabetes educator (CDE).


View full-size image.

Fig. 1. The food guide pyramid for older adults. From: Tufts University, 2002: TUFTS food guide pyramid for older adults. Available at http://nutrition.tufts.edu/docs/pyramid.pdf, accessed 8 February 2009.


4. Economic factors and psychosocial support 

return to Article Outline

Low income individuals with diabetes are at particularly high risk for poor health outcomes. A cross-sectional study was conducted using an urban, diabetes education center database [20] demonstrated that low income patients presenting to the diabetes clinic were older and heavier than high income patients. Overall medication use was higher among the lower income group. This suggested that differences in clinical profiles were not the result of under-treatment and implicated lifestyle factors as potential contributors. In the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III), socio-economic status, as measured by education and income, was not associated with whether or not individuals are likely to have undiagnosed diabetes [21]. This finding suggests that screening for type 2 diabetes should focus on those adults who are at risk for diabetes in general (based on age, racial/ethnic groups, obesity and other clinical risk factors) and that socio-economic characteristics are unlikely to provide further information.

Higher levels of perceived family support and greater self-efficacy were associated with higher reported levels of diet and exercise self-care [22], reinforcing the importance of family dynamics in the elderly. Diabetes educators and healthcare providers should consider involving the entire family in the management of older patients with type 2 diabetes. Data also validate the Transtheoretical Model, where those in the action stages displayed healthier eating [23]. They also indicate that demographic and psychosocial factors may mediate readiness to change diet. Drawing on the social cognitive theory and social support literature, a qualitative study explored how spousal support influences dietary changes following a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes in middle-aged and older adults [24]. Analyses revealed five core themes related to dietary adherence: control over food, dietary competence, the degree of commitment, spousal communication, and coping with diabetes. These findings help to develop more effective, targeted nutrition messages and programs to provide specific knowledge and skills.

5. Diabetes medications, meals, and food-related glycemic excursions 

return to Article Outline

The clinically important extrinsic modifiers of glycemic levels include diet, medications, activity, chronic illness, and stress. Traditionally, providers have concentrated their therapeutic efforts at controlling fasting and average glucose values. Mealtime glucose excursions, such as those occurring in an absorptive state, are also responsible for overall glucose burden. With advancing age, post-meal glucose glycemic excursions are the initial abnormality that progress to fasting and pre-meal elevations. Mechanisms by which post-meal glucose elevations and glycemic variability carries an increased risk of endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and possibly vascular complications, perhaps independently of the HbA1c level [25]. Acute elevations of plasma glucose concentrations trigger an array of tissue responses that may contribute to the development of vascular complications, especially in the older person with diabetes [26]. The ominous finding is that post-prandial glucose may be a risk factor for cardiovascular disease and chronic diabetic complications [27]. Simple clinical characteristics identify subsets of diabetic patients with frequent post-prandial hyperglycaemia. Thus in multivariate analysis adjusted for pre-prandial glucose levels, older age, longer duration of diabetes, absence of obesity, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension were significantly associated with greater glucose excursions after meals [28].

The American Geriatric Society’s stance is that a person’s functional capacity and not age should determine the best treatment modality individualized to each situation [29]. Diet and exercise form the cornerstone of therapy of older persons. The importance of diet and lifestyle changes is reinforced in the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes consensus algorithm released recently [30]. Oral agents provide a valuable armamentarium, although there may be a propensity to side effects to many of the medication classes currently available. Metformin is a useful first-line agent that may be initiated along with lifestyle modifications or shortly thereafter, but may be contraindicated because of the presence of renal insufficiency. Sulfonylureas should be used cautiously since the elderly are prone to hypoglycemia. Thiazolidinediones reduce insulin resistance but also cause fluid retention and may precipitate edema and congestive heart failure. The effect of aging on metabolism and pharmacokinetics also need to be taken into account. In general, treatment strategies follow a continuum over time from lifestyle modification to intensive management [31]. Intensive insulin therapy, through the use of either multiple daily injections (MDII) or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII, or insulin pump therapy), has been demonstrated to be beneficial in the elderly [32], [33]. Such insulin regimens, although complex, should not be withheld from older patients if they are otherwise capable of understanding and adhering to the treatment. General practitioners and patients alike have reluctance to initiating insulin, the so-called phenomenon of ‘clinical inertia’. The expertise of endocrinologists may be highly desirable in this regard. A big advantage of tailoring insulin to patients’ glucose profiles is a more precise control of meal-related hyperglycemia, as long as a physiologic ‘basal-bolus’ insulin regimen is used and timing of injections to food is achieved. In addition, the use of carbohydrate counting or exchange lists gives more flexibility to the older adult with diabetes. It must be kept in mind, however, that there is a lack of evidence-based outcomes regarding intensive management in older patients, and the risk-benefit ratio should always be calculated in the individual person. Hypoglycemia and hypoglycemia unawareness is more deleterious in the elderly and should be avoided. Properly conducted studies evaluating safe and effective use of diet and insulin treatment algorithms are needed.

6. Nutrition in the management of complications and co-morbidities 

return to Article Outline

Maintenance of adequate hydration may be challenging in the elderly suffering from significant hyperglycemia, yet is an important parameter to monitor. Changes in thirst perception, cultural and eating habits, and cognitive of functional impairment may play a role. Hypertension is a common comorbid health condition in older patients with diabetes. Individuals with diabetic nephropathy may need both sodium and protein restriction. Although protein needs for the aged are the same or slightly higher than other adults, a moderate reduction may be in order if advanced renal insufficiency is present. Less than half of non-institutionalized older population with diabetes who have indications for angiotensin-converting enzyme and angiotensin-receptor blockers are actually receiving them [34]. Diabetes is a “cardiac risk equivalent” that mandates adherence to a low-fat, step 1 or step 2 diet as advised by the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III guidelines (updated in 2004 to include more aggressive targets in patients with diabetes) [35]. The risk of peripheral vascular disease in persons with diabetes mellitus increases with advanced age, necessitating clinical vigilance [36]. Individualized and comprehensive prevention efforts are required to address the complicated and diverse nature of the diabetic foot in the elderly patient. A multidisciplinary management strategy addressing glucose control, provision of foot care education, and appropriate foot wear yields the best results. Development of lower extremity ulcers and their proper assessment is dependent on physiologic and socioeconomic factors. To help ulcer-related complications and prevent lower leg amputations, clinicians must address glucose control; the cost of supplies; the importance of offloading, nutrition, and exercise; and challenges inherent to impaired eyesight, dexterity, and ability to self-care. Maintaining optimal nutrition in order to prevent and manage foot problems remains paramount.

Evidence is increasing that oral health has important impacts on systemic health. Data describing the prevalence of dental caries and periodontal diseases in the older adult population has been published [37]. Periodontal infection is a risk factor for poor glycemic control in type 2 diabetes; however, studies on relationships among oral health status, chronic oral infections, and certain systemic diseases, specifically type 2 diabetes and aspiration pneumonia, need to be conducted. These diseases increase in occurrence and impact in older age groups. There is evidence to support recommending oral care regimens in protocols for managing type 2 diabetes and preventing aspiration pneumonia [38].

Because more than a third of people over age 65 are edentulous, the maintenance of optimal nutrition and intake of adequate cellulose fiber may be difficult to achieve. Routine dental exams and a liberal fluid ingestion usually help to prevent the tendency to constipation in these circumstances [39]. Many diabetic individuals complain of dry mouth (xerostomia), a condition that can affect oral health, nutritional status, and diet selection. Older adults with poorly controlled diabetes may have impaired salivary flow in comparison with subjects with better controlled diabetes and nondiabetic subjects, yet they may not have concomitant xerostomic complaints [39]. Routine questioning may not uncover the problem, and maintaining a high index of suspicion and meticulous physical examination are necessary.

7. Nutritional aspects in the community-dwelling elderly with diabetes 

return to Article Outline

The amount of food sufficiency and affordability influences the degree of adherence to dietary self-care behaviors. The nutrition and function study (NAFS) [40] examined whether homebound older adults with diabetes were at greater risk for heightened food insufficiency despite regular receipt of home-delivered meals. Not only did food-sufficiency status diminish over time in this sample, but it became or remained worse for older adults with diabetes. The investigators recommended developing community strategies that integrate nutrition with diabetes care plans, thus supporting a multidisciplinary, chronic care model to improve diabetes management and outcomes in the older population. An Australian study [41] concluded that only 4.3% of subjects with diabetes met all macronutrient recommendations, only 2.4% had adequate fiber intake, and the calculated glucose load of the diet in older individuals was only slightly lower than that of younger people. Thus only a small percentage was able to meet nutritional recommendations for optimal diabetes management. Diet and exercise practices obtained from a nationally representative sample of US adults with type 2 diabetes, many of whom were older than age 50 [42], showed that 36% of the sample was overweight, 31% reported no regular physical activity, and 62% percent ate fewer than five servings of fruits and vegetables per day. Almost two thirds of the respondents consumed >30% of their daily calories from fat and >10% of total calories from saturated fat. Lower income and increasing age were associated with physical inactivity. In conclusion, the majority of individuals with type 2 diabetes was overweight, did not engage in recommended levels of physical activity, and did not follow dietary guidelines for fat, fruit, and vegetable consumption.

As the epidemic of diabetes rages on, ensuring proper nutritional intake is an important challenge facing communities world wide. The presence of senility and frailty in the elderly person suffering from diabetes makes this task even more difficult. Community nurses will have increasingly larger caseloads of elderly patients with diabetes [43]. Home visits and interactions with family members will require special attention. It is important that visiting nurses assess the patient’s understanding of the disease and its treatment. The aim of good diabetic control in the elderly person may not be the same as in other age groups. Amelioration of symptoms is foremost, although reducing morbidity from complications is a worthy long-term goal [44]. The degree of glycemic control should be decided on an individual basis. Factors that affect the patients’ quality of life and their ability to manage their condition should be assessed. The importance of diet, blood glucose monitoring and adherence to prescribed medications are important aspects of care for the frail elderly with diabetes [45].

The principles of sound nutrition remain as true in the older person with diabetes as in younger ones [46]; however, financial considerations have to be taken into account. The social dynamics that affect lifestyle changes include retirement, widowhood, or moving into an assisted living facility, all of which can cause emotional instability and impact the quantity and quality of food consumed. Anticipation of the cost of food and the provision of low-cost alternatives should be sought. Resources available for adequate short- and long-term nutritional supplementation include adult day care centers, social services, “meals-on-wheels”, in-home personal aides, aging centers, food stamps, and community nutritional sites [47]. Food palatability and consistency as well as cultural preferences and life-long culinary habits are important considerations in the diabetic patient for optimal weight maintenance and glucose control. Useful points to keep in mind when addressing nutritional issues in the elderly with diabetes are listed in Table 2.

Table 2.

Key points to take into consideration with regard to nutrition in the elderly patient with diabetes.


The prevalence of diabetes increases with age and is likely to coexist with other chronic health conditions

Appetite changes, palatability, dietary restrictions, and psychosocial issues becomes increasingly important factors in the elderly

Nutritional should be guided by glycemic control, long-term risk of vascular complications, and by the patient’s preferences and quality of life

Awareness of nutritional guidelines and tailoring them to the elderly diabetic patient is a prudent approach

8. Conclusion 

return to Article Outline

Abnormal glucose tolerance is present in more than 60% of adults older than 60 years of age as a result of a decrease in glucose tolerance as a result of decreased insulin sensitivity and impairment of pancreatic beta-cell function. The elderly diabetic population stands to benefit enormously from streamlining and optimizing diet planning in order to enhance longevity, minimize complications, and improve quality of life. Current diet and lifestyle recommendations for patients with diabetes mellitus mainly focus on young and middle-aged persons. There is a paucity of definitive, long-term studies examining the part that nutrition plays in the overall health and metabolism of older people. In order to meet these challenges, it is imperative to understand the role of dietary factors in the genesis and progression of glucose intolerance and diabetes in the older individual and implement evidences based recommendations tailored to the specific circumstances.

References 

return to Article Outline

[1]. [1]Franco OH, Steyerberg EW, Hu FB, Mackenbach J, Wilma Nusselder W. Associations of diabetes mellitus with total life expectancy and life expectancy with and without cardiovascular disease. Arch Int Med. 2007;167:1145–1151.

[2]. [2]Russell LB, Valiyeva E, Roman SH, Pogach LM, Suh DC, Safford MM. Hospitalizations, nursing home admissions, and deaths attributable to diabetes. Diab Care. 2005;28(7):1611–1617.

[3]. [3]Gregg EW, Beckles GL, Williamson DF, Leveille SG, Langlois JA, Engelgau MM, et al. Diabetes and physical disability among older US adults. Diab Care. 2000;23(9):1272–1277.

[4]. [4]Jen KL, Brogan K, Washington OG, Flack JM, Artinian NT. Poor nutrient intake and high obese rate in an urban African American population with hypertension. J Am Coll Nutr. 2007;26(1):57–65. MEDLINE

[5]. [5]Shorr RI, Franse LV, Resnick HE, Di Bari M, Johnson KC, Pahor M. Glycemic control of older adults with type 2 diabetes: findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(3):264–267. MEDLINE

[6]. [6]Beers MH, Berkow R, editors. The Merck manual of geriatrics. Medical services, USMEDSA, USHH. Section 1. Nutritional disorders. Malnutrition; 2000–2004 [chapter 2]. <www.merck.com/mrkshared/mmanual/section/chapter2/2a.jsp> [accessed 20.01.09].

[7]. [7]Markson EW. Functional, social, and psychological disability as causes of loss of weight and independence in older community-living people. Clin Geriatr Med. 2007;13:639–652. MEDLINE

[8]. [8]Malnutrition universal screening tool (MUST). British association for parenteral and enteral nutrition (BAPEN), Advancing clinical nutrition. Malnutrition Advisor Group (MAG). Nutricia Ltd., UK; 2003 <http://www.bapen.org.uk/pdfs/must/must_full.pdf> [accessed 20.01.09].

[9]. [9]Nutrition screening initiative. Nutrition interventions manual for professionals caring for older Americans. Washington DC: Greer, Margolis, Mitchell, Grunwald and Associates; 1992.

[10]. [10]Reaven GM. Banting lecture 1988. Role of insulin resistance in human disease. Diabetes. 1988;37(12):1595–1607. MEDLINE

[11]. [11]Barbara A, Ramlo-Halsted BA, Edelman SV. The natural history of type 2 diabetes: practical points to consider in developing prevention and treatment strategies. Clin Diab. 2000;18(2):80–84.

[12]. [12]Sahyoun NR, Anderson AL, Kanaya AM, Koh-Banerjee P, Kritchevsky SB, de Rekeneire N, et al. Dietary glycemic index and load, measures of glucose metabolism, and body fat distribution in older adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;82(3):547–552. MEDLINE

[13]. [13]Dye CJ, Haley-Zitlin V, Willoughby D. Insights from older adults with type 2 diabetes: making dietary and exercise changes. Diabetes Educ. 2003;29(1):116–127. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[14]. [14]Ellis J, Johnson MA, Fischer JG, Hargrove JL. Nutrition and health education intervention for whole grain foods in the Georgia older Americans nutrition programs. J Nutr Elder. 2005;24(3):67–83. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[15]. [15]Miller CK, Edwards L, Kissling G, Sanville L. Evaluation of a theory-based nutrition intervention for older adults with diabetes mellitus. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002;102(8):1069–1081. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (818 KB) | CrossRef

[16]. [16]Chernoff R. Nutrition and health promotion in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(Spec No 2):47–53.

[17]. [17]Marlett JA, McBurney MI, Slavin JL. American dietetic association. Position of the American dietetic association: health implications of dietary fiber. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002;102(7):993–1000. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (1065 KB) | CrossRef

[18]. [18]Templeton CL. Nutrition education: the older adult with diabetes. Diab Ed. 1991;17(5):355–356358.

[19]. [19]George VA, Stevenson J, Harris CL, Casazza K. CDE and non-CDE dietitians’ knowledge of exercise and content of exercise programs for older adults with type 2 diabetes. J Nutr Ed Behav. 2006;38(3):157–162.

[20]. [20]Rabi DM, Edwards AL, Svenson LW, et al. Clinical and medication profiles stratified by household income in patients referred for diabetes care. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2007;6:11. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[21]. [21]Wilder RP, Majumdar SR, Klarenbach SW, Jacobs P. Socio-economic status and undiagnosed diabetes. Diab Res Clin Pract. 2005;70(1):26–30.

[22]. [22]Wen LK, Shepherd MD, Parchman ML. Family support, diet, and exercise among older Mexican Americans with type 2 diabetes. Diab Ed. 2004;30(6):980–993.

[23]. [23]Vallis M, Ruggiero L, Greene G, Jones H, Zinman B, Rossi S, et al. Stages of change for healthy eating in diabetes: relation to demographic, eating-related, health care utilization, and psychosocial factors. Diab Care. 2003;26:1468–1474.

[24]. [24]Beverly EA, Miller CK, Wray LA. Spousal support and food-related behavior change in middle-aged and older adults living with type 2 diabetes. Health Ed Behav. 2008;35:707–720.

[25]. [25]Brownlee M, Hirsch IB. Glycemic variability: a hemoglobin A1c—independent risk factor for diabetic complications. JAMA. 2006;295:1707–1708. CrossRef

[26]. [26]Abbatecola AM, Paolisso G. Plasma glucose excursions in older persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Endocrinol Invest. 2005;28(11 Suppl. Proceedings):105–107. MEDLINE

[27]. [27]Gerich JE. Postprandial hyperglycemia and cardiovascular disease. Endocr Pract. 2006;12(Suppl. 1):47–51.

[28]. [28]Bonora E, Corrao G, Bagnardi V, Ceriello A, Comaschi M, Montanari P, et al. Prevalence and correlates of post-prandial hyperglycaemia in a large sample of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 2006;49(5):846–854. CrossRef

[29]. [29]Hainer TA. Managing older adults with diabetes. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2006;18(7):309–317. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[30]. [30]Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB, Ferrannini E, Holman RR, Sherwin R, et al. Medical management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy: a consensus statement of the American diabetes association and the European association for the study of diabetes. Diab Care. 2009;32:192–203.

[31]. [31]Oiknine R, Mooradian AD. Drug therapy of diabetes in the elderly. Biomed Pharmacother. 2003;57(5–6):231–239. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[32]. [32]Raskin P, Bode BW, Marks JB, et al. A randomized, parallel group, 24-week study. Diab Care. 2003;26(9):2598–2603.

[33]. [33]Rizvi AA. Benefits of insulin pump therapy in the elderly. Geriatric Times. 2002;3(4):23–30.

[34]. [34]Rosen AB. Indications for and utilization of ACE inhibitors in older individuals with diabetes. Findings from the national health and nutrition examination survey 1999 to 2002. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(4):315–319. CrossRef

[35]. [35]Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Merz CNB, et al. NCEP report: implication of recent clinical trials for the national cholesterol education program adult treatment panel III guidelines. Circulation. 2004;110:227–239. CrossRef

[36]. [36]Van Gils CC, Stark LA. Diabetes mellitus and the elderly: special considerations for foot ulcer prevention and care. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2006;52(9):50–5254, 56. MEDLINE

[37]. [37]Taylor GW, Loesche WJ, Terpenning MS. Impact of oral diseases on systemic health in the elderly: diabetes mellitus and aspiration pneumonia. J Public Health Dent. 2000;60(4):313–320. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[38]. [38]Loesche W, Schork A, Terpenning M, Yin-Miao Chen, Dominguez L, Grossman N. Assessing the relationship between dental disease and coronary artery disease in elderly US veterans. J Am Dent Assoc. 1998;129:301–311. MEDLINE

[39]. [39]Chávez EM, Borrell LN, Taylor GW, Ship JA. A longitudinal analysis of salivary flow in control subjects and older adults with type 2 diabetes. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001;91(2):166–173. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (133 KB) | CrossRef

[40]. [40]Sharkey JR. Longitudinal examination of homebound older adults who experience heightened food insufficiency: effect of diabetes status and implications for service provision. Gerontologist. 2005;45(6):773–782. MEDLINE

[41]. [41]Barclay AW, Brand-Miller JC, Mitchell P. Macronutrient intake, glycaemic index and glycaemic load of older Australian subjects with and without diabetes: baseline data from the Blue Mountains Eye study. Br J Nutr. 2006;96(1):117–123. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[42]. [42]Nelson KM, Reiber G, Boyko EJ. NHANES III. Diet and exercise among adults with type 2 diabetes: findings from the third national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES III). Diab Care. 2002;25(10):1722–1728.

[43]. [43]Mayes M. Management of the older person with diabetes in the community. Br J Comm Nurs. 2000;5(9):448–453.

[44]. [44]Gallichan M. Promoting health in older people with diabetes. Prof Nurse. 1997;13(2):96–100. MEDLINE

[45]. [45]AADE: special considerations for the education and management of older adults with diabetes. American association of diabetes educators. Diabetes Educ 1999;25(6):879–81.

[46]. [46]Gilden JL. Nutrition and the older diabetic. Clin Geriatr Med. 1999;15(2):371–390. MEDLINE

[47]. [47]Stanley K. Assessing the nutritional needs of the geriatric patient with diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 1998;24:29–36. MEDLINE | CrossRef

Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Two Medical Park, Suite 306, Columbia, SC 29203, USA

Corresponding Author InformationTel.: +1 803 540 1000; fax: +1 803 545 5348.

PII: S1877-5934(09)00016-2

doi:10.1016/j.ijdm.2009.05.002


View previous. 9 of 19 View next.